Skip to content
zenfai
zenfai

One department. One measurable workflow.

Reviewing results

Make review part of the task.

Decide what needs checking, who makes the decision and what happens when information is missing.

01

Keep the source within reach.

A prepared result should be checked against its source and the company template. Compare identifiers, required fields, dimensions or terms as appropriate for the task.

The public workspace lets you open existing source files and results to inspect this pattern. It does not perform a new run or approve a document for you.

02

Separate preparation from decisions.

Agree which steps the configured task prepares and which decisions belong to a person. Prices, technical suitability, contractual terms and customer commitments need the responsible team’s review.

A missing field should remain visible as an unresolved issue rather than be filled with a guess. Decide who supplies that information and when the result is ready to use.

03

Agree the review record.

Before a pilot, decide what evidence needs to be kept: the input version, configured rules, reviewed output and any corrections. Record-keeping features and responsibilities depend on the agreed setup.

This website shows prepared examples and review concepts. It is not proof that a live approval queue, audit service or customer integration has been delivered.

01

Before you start

Check the output against the source.

Assign responsibility for business decisions.

Agree how to record corrections and unresolved details.

Keep exploring.

Start with one task.

Tell us what your team repeats and the result you need. We'll discuss a useful starting point and what a pilot should prove.

Discuss your task

Start with a description. No private files needed.